It doesn’t really matter when the following headlines were printed, except to say it was more than 40 years ago (actually it was July 14, 1967). The main point is that the issues that were being written about on the front page of The Times of London are still around today.
I wasn’t really looking for anything in particular when I came across an archived front page of the Times on its excellent web site. I was really surprised to find the similarities with today. Here is a list of the issues that were being reported on, and a curious advertisement on that day, so many years ago. First, the Times reported on a terrorist attack in Aden (a country on the southern edge of the Arabian Peninsula), in which several British soldiers were injured. This headline reminds us all that the problems in the Middle East have been around for much longer than we care to remember. The British were on a mission to exit Aden, but the locals wanted them out quicker than planned. The terrorists were also giving the British imperialists a bloody nose just for good measure. Aden was important because it overlooked the southern entrance to the Red Sea and therefore the important trade route through the Suez Canal. However, with modern transportation and the handing over of the canal to the Egyptians, a presence in Aden was not deemed strategically necessary. The US-led coalition in Iraq is probably thinking that occupying Iraq is strategically important. But times will change, and as the West weans itself off its dependence on oil, US forces will eventually leave Iraq – but only after receiving several kicks up the backside along the way out.
Coincidently, in the bottom right hand corner of the front page was an advertisement by Cleveland Discol. The advertisement was for petrol which incorporated alcohol. The spiel for the ad was that adding alcohol to the petrol that drove your automobile (they weren’t called cars yet) aided its efficiency and performance. What a shame that the idea of Cleveland Discol, or companies like it, never really took off! I don’t think that alcohol is the solution to the current fuel crisis, but rather that the use of alternatives had not been fully exploited. We would never be in the current situation of rampant price inflation – induced by the surge in the price of oil.
Part of the reason why Discol wasn’t popular and didn’t take off was because oil supplies were plentiful and were controlled by friendly regimes. Oil in fact was so cheap that, in another article, members of the British Parliament were discussing what to do about containing a bout of rampant disinflation in the UK. MPs were proposing a devaluation of Sterling to solve the issue. Of course, right now, the situation is quite the reverse. But I don’t believe the US government, or anyone else for that matter, is debating a revaluation of a particular currency to ease the effects of price inflation on the local population – except perhaps China.
What we have heard instead is pronouncements by officials that a strong US$/Euro is in the best interests of the country/region. They cannot directly legislate to change the direction of a currency. However, they can certainly try to influence a currency’s direction through the power of words – in the short term. Unfortunately, there has been some confusion over what to say, with US officials sounding like Europeans (raise rates to fight inflation) and Europeans sounding like Americans (ease off on the rate hikes, economic growth is slowing so inflation will ease anyway). There is also talk of some sort of new global currency agreement, which would be dubbed Bretton Woods III. Against this background, there are some signs that the US could ease interest rates again before the end of the year (particularly as oil companies are acting quickly to lower petrol prices as crude has fallen recently and as the economic statistics are getting grimmer by the day).
The knock on effect for Hong Kong equities has been clear – an unaccounted for interest rate cut would do wonders for Hong Kong’s property/bank-heavy stock market. News that New Zealand cut its interest rates could be the trigger for similar moves by central banks charging high interest rates in a weakening economy. This change in direction explains the third trend-change of the index in the past two weeks, and the 1,000 point rally last week. An encouraging feature of last week’s action was the pick up in turnover. And with volume barely making 100 billion, there is a suggestion that the buying was concentrated on blue-chip stocks. However, at this time, it is not safe to rely on the technical picture and there is no clear indicator to confirm that the test of 20,900 on the HS Index was the last bottom of the current bear market. It doesn’t help that 1) there is no concerted agreement regarding which direction officials are willing to talk the US$ dollar and 2) the long oil/short equities trade is still in play.
The US Treasury is probably hoping for some help from the Federal Reserve, because of the record amounts of bonds it will be auctioning in the next few weeks. The bonds are being issued to pay for the nationalization of the US economy (something that the Russians, Chinese, Cubans and Colombians will be quite amused to see). This explains why the Senate needed to get investors out of the oil/commodity markets and why those officials were talking up the US$. Someone has to buy these bonds. The Chinese and Russians and Middle Eastern emirs will have to buy. If they don’t a collapse of the US housing market will trigger a global recession, something that no one should wish for.
I only wish I could say for sure that I am happy holding this newsletter’s position in Dore (628.HK). The latest news was not good. Both Capital Research and Mr. Mark Kingdon, have reduced their stakes in the company (with the latter basically cutting his loss after receiving his shares at the placement price of 75c and selling below 30c). However, we know that the shares were sold to a relatively safe pair of hands in UBS Asset Management and Morgan Stanley (at prices ranging from 28 to 22 cents). Why Capital and Kingdon would want to take a loss on their investment is uncertain. Selling their shares so close to the result announcement last Friday was bordering on being naughty (they got away with it because the company issued a profit warning at the same time i.e. the public was aware of the goodwill write off).


















